Showing posts with label Authonomy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Authonomy. Show all posts

Monday, 26 July 2010

TECHNIQUES OF THE SELLING WRITER by Dwight V. Swain

No writer in his right mind writes by a set of rules. At least, not by somebody else's rules.

Not sure why, but mention of this very useful how-to book - the best I've come across - seems to provoke much agonised ire among some would-be paid and published writers on Authonomy.


There's some very useful stuff in here. And it works. Or, rather, it works in so far as you'll likely feel sufficiently inspired and motivated to try the techniques discussed.

Swain makes considerable effort to impress on the writer-reader that the tips, tricks and techniques discussed are simply tools - and the learning of how to deploy them is easily acquired over time. More importantly for Swain is that you, a writer, understand the why behind the techniques.

Before getting into the meat of how to build a story Swain tackles word choice and arrangement, including healthy discussion of adverbs, active verbs, meaning, denotation and connotation, vividness and brevity.

The essential building blocks of Swain's approach are Scenes and Sequels. Scene is followed by Sequel followed by Scene followed by Sequel, in a chain, from first to last page.

Scenes are units of conflict unified by time; built around Goal, Conflict and Disaster.
Sequels are units of transition that link scenes; built around Reaction, Dilemma and Decision.

Another key concept of Swain's method is the Motivation Reaction Unit. A character receives a motivating stimulus and reacts. The character's reaction breaks down into three chronologically ordered components: Feeling, Action, Speech. Each Scene and Sequel is built on a series of Motivation Reaction Units.

Essentially, however, Swain makes vital that the whole of a (selling) writer's endeavours need be based on feeling; without it you die as a writer. After laying out his position on feeling in the introductory chapter - Fiction and You - Swain uses the 47 pages of Chapter Three: Plain Facts about Feelings to discuss the importance of feelings for the writer, characters and the reader.

Without feeling he (the reader) won't care what happens in your story.
If he doesn't care, he stops reading.
And you're dead.

The book is packed with extremely useful fodder for reflection and action. Though the book does not contain any exercises, (Exercises excite no one. Palpably artificial, only tenuously related to the difficulties that beset you, they turn writing into drudgery for anyone. p.20), most honest would-be writers, I think, will find it difficult to resist trying out a few of the techniques.

Given the book was first published in 1965 some writers will cavil at Swain's references and examples, and perhaps, its sometimes antiquated tone. I find such very much part of its charm.

Editors' and readers' tastes, particularly with regard to word-count, pace and point-of-view (especially the modish Deep POV), have shifted since the book's publication -- but not so far as to undermine any of the excellent advice offered here.

A final few words from Swain:
So buckle down and forge yourself a kit of techniques out of the iron of your own copy. Each story will give you more experience to translate into literary process. Each trick mastered will free you just a little more from your feelings of inadequacy and frustration.
Finally, your excitement soars, unshackled, and to your own amazement you discover that somehow, in spite of everything, you've turned out to be a writer.

Wednesday, 15 April 2009

WRITERS' FORUMS

We all need a break during the day now and then. And, for some of us, having a break during a working day means hanging out on a writers' forum.

Why?
What do we hope to find?

Do we go there with the expectation of joining or, more boldly, initiating erudite discussion on the real grit of the nuts'n'bolts manouevres in the dark that is creating fiction and narrative non-fiction? Or, do we simply want to shoot the breeze with fellow dunces? Or, maybe expound on a pet theory? Or, maybe just remind the world that we're still here, plugging away?

Maybe we just want to connect.

Whatever your initial motivation there are dozens of sites out there where you can hang out, sound off, pick up tips, learn more than you ever wanted to know about a fellow writer's obsessions, and throw your still tiny voice around like confetti in a gale.

Here are a few writers' forums you may want to check out:

  • Absolute Write - Very much a U.S. site. Though it welcomes furriners, it's made pretty darn clear the regulars don't tolerate no Brit affectation when it comes to spelling, syntax and grammar; no way, not now, not today and not tomorrow.

  • Authonomy - Be mindful this is a competitive slushpile set-up. Possibly the most international of the forums I've visited.




  • The Write Idea - Very polite, but useful, by comparison with other sites.

  • Writers Dock - Though you may want to check this out before you commit yourself.



  • YouWriteOn - Another competitive slushpile set-up. A shadow of what it once was.

There are, of course, many, many more general writing forums out there. And then there are more focussed forums. I'll keep an eye out and report back as and when I come across them.

In the meantime please let me know your favourite forum and I'll put up a link.

Thursday, 26 March 2009

AUTHONOMY AGAIN

In an earlier post about the HarpernotCollins site Authonomy
I wrote:
"The forum can be a veritable viper's nest of vituperation, snark, nark, nay-saying, bullying, fawning and faint praise -- some of it wittty and amusing, though most of it dull, plodding and self-serving."

Had I over-egged the pudding? Well ...

Writer George La Cas, a regular over at Authonomy, left a comment and suggested I re-visit the site, which I did, and sure enough things did seem to have quietened down since the days of Joe Ridgewell. I mooched about a bit in the Forum, left a couple of links to this blog, browsed a few books, and then ... and then ...

Things got really out of hand with insults - and racist abuse - flying around on a string of threads. I spent a good few hours reading the main thread and a few spin-off threads, and chucked in my two ha'pence worth.

It was all good fun, but it wasn't easy; the site was up and down, and the electricity supply and ADSL service here was on and off all day.

Nathan Bransford, literary agent for Curtis Brown in California, posted his thoughts on the issues which prompted several comments from a few of those involved in the fracas.

Finally the administrators of Authonomy issued two statements: here and on the Authonomy blog here. When you read the blog post you'll see that yours truly has been quoted. Yes, that's right, Clive at HC lifted a quote from one of my two posts on the debacle:

'Harlson Phillips (my grandfather used to go ballistic if people spelled the family name with only two 'pees') wondered on authonomy's role in preparing authors for publication:


"If Authonomy is a testing-ground for would-be writers then surely it's equally valid to use it as such for testing other aspects of the professional writer's package than simply the text…there are dozens of other online critique sites, some general, some genre specific, where any of us can hone skills if that's what we want/need to do. But there are no sites I know of wherein you can properly practice promotion and marketing writing and writers in real time with a real audience. Here, on Authonomy, we have an opportunity to test a complete skillset before launching ourselves and our work into the 'real' world."'


HC's blog post prompted another 67 comments for, against and indifferent to HC's ruling.


If you're curious you can read the complete version of my post here in which I ramble on a bit, throwing in references to Damien Hirst, Dalí, Isadora Duncan, Michael Clark, The Beatles and Salman Rushdie, before getting to the point above.


All good fun.


It has quietened down now, but a few resentful members of the 'old guard' refuse to let the matter go, and pop up now and then to poke the slumbering bear.


Prompted by events a good dozen or more Authonomy regulars (including Fred Limberg who made the racist insults) have, if not wholly migrated, set up accounts with a fairly new peer review site, Writers Wrule, one of a dozen peer review sites you'll find links to in the sidebar here.


It all reminded me of why I avoided working with writers' groups when I worked as an arts development officer.


Tomorrow I'll be posting a very authoritative update on Macmillan New Writing.


And on Monday I hope to post an interesting list of a dozen or more publishers based in Ireland.


Stay tuned.

Tuesday, 24 February 2009

AUTHONOMY

I first became aware of UK based Harper's not Collins' Authonomy critique and plug site through the Grumpy Old Bookman. In a spate of enthusiasm I signed on. Months rolled by with no discernible signs of life on the site before re-surfacing in my purview through an invitation to test a beta version which had come via YouWriteOn. So, I visited again --- Woah! By comparison with YouWriteOn's more straightforward approach the Authonomy site at first seemed unnecessarily over-complicated and more than a tad intimidating.

If YouWriteOn's message board is a schoolyard then Authonomy's forum is a sixth-form common room, or a JCR at a Midlands university, cluttered with a rude mix of earnest fellows, smartarse slackers who routinely mistake mordant comment for wit, sensitive types who've spent too long reading de Beauvoir and Sartre, look-at-me airheads dancing on the coffee tables, and the occasional genius lurking in the corner taking it all in while jotting notes for tomorrow's seminar.

Contributors upload work for critique then roam the site to find, read and comment on others' efforts in the hope that this activity will garner sufficient positive regard to bring the attention of an editor from one of Harper's not Collins' imprints.

If reviewers like what they read they can back it by putting the title on a virtual bookshelf; if undecided, or wish to re-visit the work for closer appraisal, they can put it on a watchlist. There's no scoring; titles are positioned on the chart in line with the number of bookshelves they have appeared on. But it's not quite so straightforward, some reviewers' bookshelves count more highly than others.

On the last day of the month non-fiction as well as fiction titles which make the top 5 of what's called the Editor's Desk, join a queue for a critique from one of Harper's not Collins' editors.

There's no minimum and maximum word count for comments/critiques, so these vary wildly between 'brilliant' or 'crap' and 2000 word, in-depth essays.

The site also features an ongoing book chart based on titles' cumulative support from reviewers, and a blog featuring invited editors and writers.

There's a lot of coralling and caballing, backscratching and game playing involved. A private messaging system reinforces the networking aspect of the site.

Some contestants in this beauty pageant have confessed to spending 16 hours a day on the site.

The forum can be a veritable viper's nest of vituperation, snark, nark, nay-saying, bullying, fawning and faint praise -- some of it wittty and amusing, though most of it dull, plodding and self-serving.

There are some good people on the site, and a few very good writers, but be prepared to wade through much idle, bland natter masquerading as wit to find them.

What are your perceptions of Authonomy? What's been your experience of uploading your work?